I've given some thought as to why I'm not keen on this. I haven't used one although I did have a 'bare' blade at one point for a mod job but realised the value was high untouched so moved it on.
I have some thoughts......
1 - I just don't really get the need for the second edge on the back - I'm sure someone can explain it!
2 - saw back. The teeth on the one I had were very aggressive but on a saw that long, I'm dubious as to how easy it would be to use compared to battoning notches out (what do people
really need to cut down that's big?) but having teeth restricts how I can hold the knife in my hand and more points to nip me.
3. I understand the choil as somewhere to drop my hand further forward for finer work but I think for me, I would be doing that a lot. Why not move the edge back or would that change the balance so it's very blade heavy for fine work? I think this one might just be a visual issue - it's quite harsh on the eyes.
4. souless boring handle. I like some curves for fitting my hand better. If I'm going to chop with it, I like a bit of a flair at the end. I suppose it needs to be quite symmetrical if it's going to be used upside down for the saw, but if the saw goes (

) the handle can change too.
Yes, I understand the idea is it's a survival knife but I think I have a different view to some (the designers) but then my thoughts are also not backed by full on survival experience.
I think as a starting platform it actually has potential but to me it just looks rubbush and it's hard to get past that mentally.
Interestingly, when i googled for side on pics for photoshopping (i'll put them up later if i get chance) I found the pic above on Paul Kirtley's blog (
http://paulkirtley.co.uk/2011/dartmoor-survival-knife/) I haven't read it all yet as it's lots of words for me but I have read the final thoughts and they do suggest it's a usable knife. When I get chance, I'll see if he'll change my view on it.
