The rest of the channels are funded by advertising and other forms of support its only BBC that use the funds from the license
Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk
Regardless of that, you're still liable even if you only watch ITV.
The fact that you have TV receiving equipment makes you liable and obliged to pay TV license, regardless of you watch BBC or not, and now even if you don't have a TV but watch programs online as they're being aired, or if you watch iPlayer.
Don't even get me started on this ...
Interesting timing for this thread.
Last January we decided to get shot of all of it , as even the kids don't watch it...
I've ripped all the cable , aerial from the loft and booster , and just kept the TV set as a monitor for movies, concerts, documentaries and other stuff that we like to watch , (already have a huge collection and still hoarding...)
They still sent a swmbo a court summons, as I cancelled my subscription online , and it was only in my name.
She was the license holder for a bit (2 years ago)out of her direct debits , as I don't have a set payday , I get paid when the jobs are finished.
Then last year I started paying it and became the license holder until cancellation.
Surely I cancelled the only policy that is viable for the household but now they're trying to say she should've cancelled her policy too...
Just ridiculous and totally big bully tactics with prison threats and court summons and big big fines.
They can stick it.
I despise TV anyway , and all of these reality , celebrity rubbish.
It's all just geared to make us dumber and greedier with hardly ,
(1or2 exceptions , namely David Attenborough's and other documentaries)
any educational or purposeful value.
We read , listen to music , see friends and spend time together , indoors and outdoors, as a family.
This is just my opinion, before I get my head bitten off by the TV addicts.
Though I doubt there will be many here...
Each to their own.