I did wonder myself actually..............
(Incidentally we did have a bunch of scientists check out the forest 10 miles away for big cats and they found 'enough reason' to plan on returning)
The rear toe into the front print is a good thought. I did carefully check the area at the time and the substrate at the back was just as imprintable making me suspect a rear foot would have left more sign than just one toe though.
Yes, those tracks are lovely otter prints eh? I think this one looks very different tho...whats the general consensus on definitely not and possibly is?
"Are you kidding ?................we can't get enough of this sort of thing" lol..just as well
All the best
Rich