I'm not saying the cheaper ones are bad but a toilet roll inner is probably a greater diameter and wall thickness than the chair. Good materials and bad materials share many common properties.
Bob said they were thinner - just thought it may be interesting to compare given I have a "cheap" one.
That said, I like the design and there is no real reason, other than to get back R&D costs and make a profit (which is not only reasonable, it's completely fair for the company that got there first and put the effort in) that the chair should be as expensive as it is.
It's also a good ethical question isn't it. Just because in the far east where the factories are, it's common for items to be copied, is it right to do so or to support that? If you want one it means you like the design and it's a bit harsh to buy from someone making a blatant rip off after the original company invested in bringing it to market.
As for the feet, tennis balls are ok but I don't think they go in the bag... before I got the proper feet, I cut two lengths of pipe and drilled a hole in either end for the regular feet to go in. I saw it on another forum somewhere. They fit in the bag, weight little and work a treat.
Had the same discussion re. Woodgas stove clones. The problem is the originals price point is so high that I simply wouldn't buy one - in that sense the company that made the original is not losing money.
But in this case given REI also have a similar chair it feels to me that someone let a patent slip or they're being manufactured under licence.
Last edited: