Bushcraft4life said:
For me the other two are superior all rounders. Capable of doing most jobs. I would prefer to have a bigger axe and use a little more energy and know i can put it to most jobs than have a smaller axe i can only use for some. This is not a question i can really answer considering some people who have posted have four or five different types.
Well, l don't know what you mean by an all-rounder. For most of what I do in the woods, I find the bigger axes fairly useless and I own a good pile of both gransfors and wetterlings, including the Small FA and the Scandanavian (and the felling axe, and the splitting axe, and the mini and the carving axe) . But I rarely carry the bigger ones unless I have a canoe and then I let the canoe carry them.
Again, unless you need something to really lay in the firewood, I would get a Wildlife. You will find it a joy to use one handed, especially for any wood carving projects or small shelter building. If you want to use a bigger model for woodcarving, they will be handy for building your muscles up in your forearm.
Of the two you list, I would lean towards the smaller, simply because it's easier to use one handed. For instance, if you want to carve a canoe paddle in the wilds, you will often hold with one hand and chop with the other. The Small FA is good for this, the Wildlife better imo. Even the Swedish Carving Axe is a handlful.
Now if you are cutting and limbing large trees, then the Scandanavian is a better choice, but carving with it can make for a long day.
I think the real question is: what will you be doing with it? Guys like Nessmuk and Kephart did quite well in primitive camping situations with a small hatchet.