Semi Aquatic ancestor theory

Poacherman

Banned
Sep 25, 2023
437
213
31
Wigan
The Tierra del Fuegians might fit your criteria .....



Okay, that's stretching it a bit, 900km of rough seas......

We know the Kawesqar's were canoe builders/sailors though. Whether they ventured down the island chains and over.....who knows ? :dunno:
We didn't used to believe that the Vikings had reached America. There are Maori stories of the ice continent though.
We'd need evidences, and though ice preserves, it moves and it ends up either buried in more ice or melted at sea.

Adaptations to climateEdit

Despite the cold climate, the early Yahgan wore little to no clothing, which only changed after extended contact with Europeans.[8] They were able to survive the harsh climate because:

  • They kept warm by huddling around small fires, including in those set in boats, to stay warm. The name of "Tierra del Fuego" (land of fire) was based on the many fires seen by passing European explorers.
  • They used rock formations on their land to shelter from the elements.
  • They covered themselves in animal grease to trap heat and provide an extra layer of fat.[9]
  • Over time, they evolved significantly higher metabolisms than average humans, allowing them to generate more internal body heat.[10]
  • Their customary resting position was a deep squatting position, which reduced their surface area and helped to conserve heat.[9]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toddy

Toddy

Mod
Mod
Jan 21, 2005
39,133
4,810
S. Lanarkshire
One has to wonder why they stayed in such an unhospitable climate.....but then our folks lived and do live in parts of the country and islands that are pretty miserable climate wise. Until the arrival of the predatious europeans though, their waters were rich in high calorie food.

However, those kinds of reports are always open to interpretation. The thing is that the only people who met and wrote of them on that cusp of interaction with Europeans, did so with their own biased worldview.
Subsequent research on such peoples often shows that what was written was so false that it almost bears no reflection on reality, and I'd like to see better evidence for their metabolism changes....because while my ancestors happily trogged around Scotland in linen and wool, with bare legs, slept in the snow, etc., the present generation most certainly find that too cold. So, again, is it adaptation, not evolution ?

M
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poacherman

Toddy

Mod
Mod
Jan 21, 2005
39,133
4,810
S. Lanarkshire
The Yahgan may have been driven to the inhospitable Tierra del Fuego by enemies to the north. They were renowned for their complete indifference to the cold weather.[11] Although they had fires and small domed shelters, they routinely went about completely naked, and the women swam in cold waters hunting for shellfish.[12] They were often observed to sleep in the open, completely unsheltered and unclothed, while the Europeans shivered under blankets.[8] A Chilean researcher claimed their average body temperature was warmer than that of a European by at least one degree.[10]

Two things come to mind;
firstly wet clothing kills.
secondly, evidences of their culture do not support that they didn't have clothes or blankets.....after all in Summer, we don't wear much clothing or need blankets.

If you have time and interest, read this.....

 

Poacherman

Banned
Sep 25, 2023
437
213
31
Wigan
One has to wonder why they stayed in such an unhospitable climate.....but then our folks lived and do live in parts of the country and islands that are pretty miserable climate wise. Until the arrival of the predatious europeans though, their waters were rich in high calorie food.

However, those kinds of reports are always open to interpretation. The thing is that the only people who met and wrote of them on that cusp of interaction with Europeans, did so with their own biased worldview.
Subsequent research on such peoples often shows that what was written was so false that it almost bears no reflection on reality, and I'd like to see better evidence for their metabolism changes....because while my ancestors happily trogged around Scotland in linen and wool, with bare legs, slept in the snow, etc., the present generation most certainly find that too cold. So, again, is it adaptation, not evolution ?

M
Wikipedia is not best resource tbh you could argue the present young generation is mostly evolved for chocolates crisps fake meat veganism videogames obesity sedentary lifestyle ect.Our ancestors were not spearing sausage rolls and cream buns, it's no wonder they feel the cold superfoods like liver,oysters animal fats are hardly consumed now.Bit off a disgrace really how far we have fell off the cliff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toddy

Poacherman

Banned
Sep 25, 2023
437
213
31
Wigan
Two things come to mind;
firstly wet clothing kills.
secondly, evidences of their culture do not support that they didn't have clothes or blankets.....after all in Summer, we don't wear much clothing or need blankets.

If you have time and interest, read this.....

I take Wikipedia with a pinch off salt really, Il read that thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toddy

Toddy

Mod
Mod
Jan 21, 2005
39,133
4,810
S. Lanarkshire
There's a huge body of anthropological and archaeological literature on that topic.

While the following isn't always true for every society, for hunter/gatherer ones it seems to hold more often than not.
Men hunt, but women and children forage/gather/small hunt and actually bring in more food on a reliable basis. Men bring in 'feasting food' and bulk food for processing for storage.....like a whole deer, or in the south American's case a small whale....or seals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poacherman

Poacherman

Banned
Sep 25, 2023
437
213
31
Wigan
There's a huge body of anthropological and archaeological literature on that topic.

While the following isn't always true for every society, for hunter/gatherer ones it seems to hold more often than not.
Men hunt, but women and children forage/gather/small hunt and actually bring in more food on a reliable basis. Men bring in 'feasting food' and bulk food for processing for storage.....like a whole deer, or in the south American's case a small whale....or seals.
Off topic I wonder off a seal skin wetsuit was made ? That be cool.
 

Tengu

Full Member
Jan 10, 2006
12,976
1,628
51
Wiltshire
The Inuit had dry suits of gut. (Theres one in the British Museum).

The Yaghans had foxes in place of dogs.

(Which is why there were Foxes in the Falkland isles once...)
 

Laurentius

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
Aug 13, 2009
2,527
695
Knowhere
One has to wonder why they stayed in such an unhospitable climate.....but then our folks lived and do live in parts of the country and islands that are pretty miserable climate wise. Until the arrival of the predatious europeans though, their waters were rich in high calorie food.

However, those kinds of reports are always open to interpretation. The thing is that the only people who met and wrote of them on that cusp of interaction with Europeans, did so with their own biased worldview.
Subsequent research on such peoples often shows that what was written was so false that it almost bears no reflection on reality, and I'd like to see better evidence for their metabolism changes....because while my ancestors happily trogged around Scotland in linen and wool, with bare legs, slept in the snow, etc., the present generation most certainly find that too cold. So, again, is it adaptation, not evolution ?

M
Wim Hoff springs to mind, never mind all the mystic stuff it turns out that both he and his brother have more brown fat than the average.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toddy

Toddy

Mod
Mod
Jan 21, 2005
39,133
4,810
S. Lanarkshire
Off topic I wonder off a seal skin wetsuit was made ? That be cool.
There are a lot of examples of skin suits. Made from walrus intestine, from fish skins, etc.,
Basically they were the caguoles of their time. Thin, fine, flexible, wind and rain (or sea if used to seal into a kayak) proof.

They are a lot of patient skillful work to make though, and while they're making them those folks aren't finding food. So, to be in a postition to make them indicates that they have sufficient food and a society that will support them while they're working.
The corollary is that sometimes those garments are a necessity to gather food in the first place....kind of what comes first, the chicken or the egg ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poacherman

Poacherman

Banned
Sep 25, 2023
437
213
31
Wigan
There are a lot of examples of skin suits. Made from walrus intestine, from fish skins, etc.,
Basically they were the caguoles of their time. Thin, fine, flexible, wind and rain (or sea if used to seal into a kayak) proof.

They are a lot of patient skillful work to make though, and while they're making them those folks aren't finding food. So, to be in a postition to make them indicates that they have sufficient food and a society that will support them while they're working.
The corollary is that sometimes those garments are a necessity to gather food in the first place....kind of what comes first, the chicken or the egg ?
Have u got any links to this? I find it v interesting
 

Pattree

Full Member
Jul 19, 2023
2,086
1,123
77
UK
Jacket made from the foreskin of a whale.

Don’t blame me! Blame Hermon Melville Moby Dick isn’t just a fictional story, it’s a treatise on whaling.
 

GNJC

Forager
Jul 10, 2005
167
121
Carms / Sir Gar
The fact that a hominin can easily cope with or thrive in an aquatic environment is not evidence that it evolved in one; the aquatic ape theory has been comprehensively rejected by anthropology as a whole, if not be individual anthropologists.

As for foxes in the Falklands... firstly they were a sub-species of wolf, secondly their existence there outdates the first evidence of humans on the Falklands by thousands of years. Of course future discoveries may provide evidence for an earlier human presence there, but not yet.
 

GNJC

Forager
Jul 10, 2005
167
121
Carms / Sir Gar
That's not really accurate - wolf and fox have a common evolutionary ancestor, they have diverged into separate species. At no time was a wolf an evolutionary ancestor of the fox.
I think you have misunderstood my post; my use of the word 'firstly' was not in reference to what those animals originated as but, instead, to make clear it was the 'first' point. Hence my rather imaginative and clever use of the word 'secondly' to make the second point. :)
 

BCUK Shop

We have a a number of knives, T-Shirts and other items for sale.

SHOP HERE