What's the difference between the two? and why the preference to SASS smock instead of the para one?
Fingers of lightning!
I think the only real differences between a SAS smock and an Arctic smock is the hood and maybe the rank slides. SAS has rank slides on the rear aswell as the front, Arctic hood is massive and wired. This is so that a helmet can be worn under the hood apparently, although the normal reason is so that when you are on a Herc you can oull the whole hood over your head to cover your face and wob out, or hide the fear in your eyes from your mates!
![]()
I used my arctic smock in anger in Norway and it was the dogs, the hood is big so you have plenty of air space inside when you close it up to your face in the event of an avalanche.
Para smock - Made from cotton modal, similar pocket configuration as above but with press stud closure. Rank epaulette's on shoulders, small collar, no hood. Crutch strap, external on rear. Knitted cuff's.The design of the para smock, i believe, was similar to the Denison smock used in WW2 and up to the early '60's. It was meant to go over the webbing and battledress so any of the parachute lines did not get caught in the straps and buckles. That is why the pockets have press stud's instead of buttons, so if there is a snag, it will just pull the pocket open. It was meant to be discarded with the parachute at the DZ after landing.
Para smocks are only good for Parachuting which is what they are designed for.
I think you mean the SAS smock which is what the SASS smock is designed from.
The SAS smock is a very good all rounder, it has plenty of pockets, a hood, and because its made from Gaberdine it is windproof.
You can also get an Arctic smock which is basically the same but it has a wired hood.
SASS make the SAS smock in Ventile and gaberdine with or without a wired hood depending on which one you want and also with or without woolen elasticated cuffs again depending on your personal preference.
I hope this helps.