mark a. said:
Yes, but here we're talking about a choice between someone who doesn't know what he's doing vs someone who doesn't know what he's doing but has a GPS. I'd go with the latter any time..
Absolutely. The simple truth of that is very, very hard to ignore.
I'm not suggesting replacing map & compass with a GPS, or relying on a GPS as a sole source of navigational equipment, but the fact is, if the chap mentioned in this thread had taken one with him, he almost certainly would not of got lost.
I agree, nothing replaces good mapreading skills, but misplaced confidence in ones own navigational abilities is far worse than taking a GPS along as a backup. If it gets lost or broken, fair enough. If the batteries bleed flat, fair enough. But if an experienced hiker gets lost and they
dont have a GPS with them at all and their excuse is that they dont need one because they are a good map reader, ...I'd say
"so how come you got lost?" ...and
"..by the way, here's the bill for the S&R".
Pride comes before a fall ...or a ride in a helicopter.
Ogri the trog said:
Without doubt, things will on occasion, go wrong. That is the reason we feel humbled by the efforts of the volunteers of Mountain Rescue, SAR etc; but folk who call on such organisations for the flimsiest of reasons should be obliged to repay their debt for going unprepared.
My point exactly.
GPS are relatively cheap now, small, light and very reliable. Yes they can break or get lost, but so can compasses. Granted they run on batteries, but so do torches. I bet most people would throw a torch in their pack without a seconds hesitation.
If it makes people feel better, they could seal it up in a bag and mark it "open only when hopelessly lost", but going someplace with the potential to get hoplessley lost without one, is staggeringly negligent IMO.