I know that I have seen this discussed somewhere on here, but can't find it easily. Possibly we should dig up all the discussion on knife construction/design and put it as an article or something. So that it is easier to find without ploughing through the forum?
Full tang can be used to mean slightly different things by different makers, but generally means that you can see metal all the way around the handle. As on the Woodlore, the metal runs the full depth of the handle, not just being exposed at the rear. The handle is made of a couple of slabs pinned or bolted to the sides of the tang.
It could be argued that knives like the Falkniven A1 etc have a full tang, as it runs the full length of the handle to protrude at the butt to give a hammering surface. It is something of a matter of semantics.
The short answer for why some knives are made one way and some another, is that it comes down to the opinion of the maker! This topic has been debated back and forth on every forum you can think of and I don't think there has ever been a final agreement
If you look at the Kellam video of them abusing a knife :shock: with a hidden tang you would he hard put to say that it isn't strong enough!
There is MUCH more to good knife handle design than just strength. You want enough strength, in addition to ergonomics, ease of maintenance, comfort, security, and economics.
Hiding the tang in the handle means it cah't rust so easily, it means the handle stays warmer in cold weather, the wood can be sealed more easily and the handle shaped more easily by the maker. It also makes ballancing the knife easier, in most cases. With machine tools though it tends to require more work to enclose the tang than it does to slap a couple of flat slabs onto a full tang.