Walking through the trees today we had a discussion on whether they formed a wood or forest. It's irrelevant to our enjoyment but curiosity beckons. What is the difference between the three terms? I'm in the UK, England to be precise, so I'm thinking in UK terms only.
IMHO a forest is a bigger, thicker, more in every way than a wood. If you're walking through open woods that end before your walk then it's likely to be woods. Forests are closer to what you get in mainland Europe and Americas in the boreal forests. There are some in the UK both natural and man-made but usually wilder areas such as Northumberland, Dumfries and Galloway, Highlands such as North of the be Cairngorms/near Aviemore and areas in Snowdonia where there's actually a rainforest. I don't see grizedale or whinlatter as more than woods.
I'm probably being too critical but with everything someone's or some organisation has defined terms. What are they with bodies of trees?
IMHO a forest is a bigger, thicker, more in every way than a wood. If you're walking through open woods that end before your walk then it's likely to be woods. Forests are closer to what you get in mainland Europe and Americas in the boreal forests. There are some in the UK both natural and man-made but usually wilder areas such as Northumberland, Dumfries and Galloway, Highlands such as North of the be Cairngorms/near Aviemore and areas in Snowdonia where there's actually a rainforest. I don't see grizedale or whinlatter as more than woods.
I'm probably being too critical but with everything someone's or some organisation has defined terms. What are they with bodies of trees?