I've not seen this mentioned regarding Laplanders and Silky's so i'll bring it up...
Why no mention of tooth size? Silkys can have varying teeth sizes which translates to the distance between them and how much material can be removed. WHo owns a silky with fine teeth? Who owns one with large teeth? Anyone have one with Medium teeth? They all play a big part in what you're cutting. If you have a large tooth Silky and then use it for dry, dead wood... its gonna do a poor job. They are designed for green wood, the larger spacing between the teeth allows for more material removal, which you need for wet, fresh fibres. Fine teeth, are for dry wood, as each tooth wont cut as deep, so wont produce as much waste so you need more teeth, for them to cut efficiently.
A laplander has similar to a silky's medium blades, but has twice as many cutting teeth, due to it having 2 rows of them. Making it a jack of all, master of none. Silky blades are specific to the wood being cut... Laplander blades give no sh.ts. A laplander will out perform a silky with medium teeth, across all cutting scenarios, a large tooth silky will beat a laplander in green wood. A fine tooth silky blade, will beat a laplander, specifically in dry wood.
This is why i feel the laplander is the better woods saw, if you aren't going to cut a certain thing specifically.
Yes, you can carry different types of blades for the silky... but that £25 all purpose saw that is a laplander, just became a £75 all purpose, but more brittle saw.
If they made a big boy sized Laplander, i'd be all over that!!