Earliest form of firelighting in the UK

  • Come along to the amazing Summer Moot (21st July - 2nd August), a festival of bushcrafting and camping in a beautiful woodland PLEASE CLICK HERE for more information.
That is such a good point :D
Preserving fire is a much under rated area of research.

Re flint:.......I have done a lot of field walking in Scotland, if we find flint, we know someone took it there.
The diagnostic for the Mesolithic are tiny flint flakes, cores worked until there is no way to get another small sharp edge from it, and beautifully worked tiny arrow heads.
Flint was preciously used, not shattered against pyrites.

Drilling holes in stones is a much more reliable method in the damp north than trying to get clay hard fired in doughnut shapes.
I'm sure that the Loch Olibhat excavations (2000 bce) had some and I'm sure they were drilled (paralled sided holes) and not pecked.

cheers,
Toddy
 
That is such a good point :D
Re flint:.......I have done a lot of field walking in Scotland, if we find flint, we know someone took it there.

True that there isn't very much up this way but there is some.

Im not too clued up on the burial rituals of the Mesolithic, would they have burned their dead rather than buried? I know that when the Neolithic comes along chambered cairns seem to be the way to go for that.

So in areas sparse of flint it either suggests that trade was pretty common and if in areas of Scotland or other places where there is a lack of flint & pyrites, these routes would have been quite long. On the other hand if trade and long distance communications was not so popular would that not suggest other methods of fire lighting in these areas?
 
10,000 years ago the Thames was just a tributary of the Reine and Britain was not an Island, so trade routes would not have been that much of a problem, Even Ireland, as it was joined to Wales.
 
10,000 years ago the Thames was just a tributary of the Reine and Britain was not an Island, so trade routes would not have been that much of a problem, Even Ireland, as it was joined to Wales.


Ahh yes, forgot about that :o , its called Doggerland, but it was gradually disappearing after the ice had retreated and the land was returning to normal. (weight of the ice etc)
 
To be perfectly honest I reckon that there's never only been one way.
Humanity is just too creatively inventive for that.

Use what you have, especially for something as commonplace as firelighting.

iirc the Boddam flints are not well exploited. We know now that they are there, and the site is scheduled, do you know of any research into their earliest workings?
Part of the problem of such sites is that subsequent workings, right up until very recent times in some areas, removes any evidences for earlier workings.

I am certain though, that had flint been available, we would not find such a plethora of artifacts made from pitchstone, bloodstone, chert and the like through much of the country (Scotland).

Trading networks are long, but we have no indication of timewise how long it took for an item to travel.

Bronze age Scotland has jet necklaces, and the nearest source of jet is Whitby in Yorkshire. Yorkshire also has flint. So by then we know flint is available, but we still don't find struck flint/pyrities.

Not my particular interest, but anyone working up here gains some background knowledge of the potential natural resources.

cheers,
Toddy
 
Hello Redneck, et al,
Congratulations, you've prompted what has already develop into a worthwhile and fascinating discussion.

First of all, let me qualify myself by stating that I am not an archaeologist and no expert and fully believe that those who promote themselves as experts in a field should be viewed with extreme suspicion. Neither do I see myself as a Bushcrafter but rather as a mountaineer who never stopped for long enough to appreciate or to take stock of the skills I had acquired along the way until I matured, becoming older and more crabbit.

Fire, for me, is only ever a luxury on a beautiful spring or late autumn evening, or after the fire is established and my camp consolidated. Otherwise it has been a necessity as defence against midgies, mosies and clegs, misery or hypothermia and on the odd occasion, a matter of life or death.

I do not wish to deride anyone or undervalue the fascination of fire-making or the practice of skills and sheer enjoyment of doing so, but because of experience I do view the use of anything other than the quickest and most reliable way of making fire as an indulgence. I use a cigarette lighter, carry a mag-rod, firelighters, rubber, cotton wool, birchbark, amadou and anything else I know will take a spark or burn readily.

I'm convinced that our ancestors would have had much the same attitude as I do with regard to getting a fire going as quickly and easily as possible and would most certainly have used a cigarette lighter if they could have got their hands on gas refills and I'd bet, given half the chance, they'd have had a few stories to tell about idiots throwing petrol on the fire.

I agree with you entirely regarding your conjecture that the bow-drill is a technological development, that the hand-drill probably came first and that the Spark was the business in Europe both before the development of other methods and long after they had fallen from vogue or had been forgotten!

Toddy's axiom, that "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" is wonderful... if inconvenient! Flint is present in Scotland, as are agate, quartz, jasper and chert, all of which will indeed make a spark. Iron is also present and although there may be a rarity of nodes such as are present elsewhere in Britain and the European continent, trade, barter and commerce are nothing new and there is evidence of coastal and continental trade away before the early bronze age into the neolithic and probably Mesolithic. We have fine stone axe and mace heads made from jadeite and other materials, which could only have been imported from continental Europe, in our museums and there appears to be some uniformity in size and form throughout Europe from the Neolithic to the weights and measures of the late Bronze Age EU Standards.

A particularly provocative idea for me is that early bronze weapon design compares sexily with Mesolithic design and I believe that familiar skills and technology were merely transferred from familiar materials to the new, and the use of fire may well have been the catalyst! C'mon Baby light my fire!

I hold issue with your belief that our ancestry is no older than the Neolithic (presuming you are referring to Britain and not the Americas... Redneck? And the Mesolithic Solutreans believed to be the first settlers of what are now the Americas predate your "Neolithic (10,000 - 4,000 years ago)" by a possible 5,000 years), as the evidence of Mesolithic occupation is everywhere and one of the first long-term neolithic camps discovered in Britain is just along the coast from me at Morton Farm near Tentsmuir in Fife, with an abundance of microliths, hammers and other tools and enormous shell and bone middens.

Just two miles from my home are the Wemyss Caves (Wemyss = uamh; Gaelic and probably Brithonic, "cave") which are covered in graffiti and carvings, from "Wee Tam loves Tracy", past more modern times of the Hammer and Sickle, Fleur de lys, Union Jack, Lion Rampant, the Norse Thor and companion goat (I'd have thought he'd have a Rottweiler or a Pit Bull), a long ship complete with mast and sail, oars, helmsman and steering oar (obviously carved some time after a sudden bowel evacuation); Pictish floral rods, mirror and crescents (The Experts again), Z-rods, bulls, salmon, wolves, deer, horses; an odd deer/horse looking animal with a conspicuous elongated head makes me wonder when the last Scottish elk died! There are tether points the likes of which I've only seen in the Mediterranean, double ballock and erections, female fertility symbols (which The Experts refer to as bird-symbols because they look like a bird head with eyes above a V shaped beak), Mesolithic cup and ring marks: And symbols which I believe to be so ancient, strange and alien that they are meaningless to us. Perhaps the product of a different thought process, understanding and world view to Modern Man!

Neanderthal remains have been recovered from Doggerland. Sea level rose markedly after the last Ice Age retreat and what was sea level in the Mesolithic is now some 30 - 50 mtrs below present. An area of the North East is currently being investigated on the grounds that soil deposits, stratification and formation may indicate that the immediate area remained ice free during the last Ice Age, increasing the probability of human occupation. About 10 years ago there were artifacts found in a limestone cave in the Eribole area of the far north of Scotland, the implications being that an Inuit type people lived or visited the cave some 15,000 years ago or earlier.

It is my belief that all of these people had fire, but not all of them had access to wood! All of them had fire but not all of them were party to the same technological advantage. One thing is patently obvious, that our ancestors were highly resilient and intelligent with an array of skills and knowledge of their environment which we can only glimpse as though through the wrong end of our electron microscopes.

Just delighted at having the opportunity to express myself, so thank you all.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps his first house was a cave?
Perhaps his first weapon was a stone
Perhaps his first boat was of reeds
Perhaps his God was the Sun.
Perhaps Wikipedia has the answer.? Or perhaps not. there's so many variables. I guess we'll never know for sure.

Those are perfect answers and ones I concur with most heartily ( apart from maybe the wiki one!!)..:notworthy
 
10,000 years is really pretty recent in the scheme of things. There is evidence for the use of fire (although no evidence of how it was actually made) in Britain as far back as 275,000 years ago.
 
I hold issue with your belief that our ancestry is no older than the Neolithic

There are, IIRC, 5 previous waves of primary colonisation, but it's only the most recent one at the end of the last glaciation that directly contributes to our ancestry. All the earlier ones left when the land returned to being buried under several kilometers of ice.
 
There are, IIRC, 5 previous waves of primary colonisation, but it's only the most recent one at the end of the last glaciation that directly contributes to our ancestry. All the earlier ones left when the land returned to being buried under several kilometers of ice.

I'm aware of this argument, Gregorach, but this is now being challenged for the first time with tangible evidence. The implications of geological research being carried out in Buchan and a few other areas of the mainland, are that certain areas remained ice-free during the last glaciation. To my knowledge, no evidence has yet emerged of human occupation during this period, but it's early days yet... and there is still the submerged coastline to survey.

http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/915/1/clarkcd2.pdf
2.2.1. Northern and Central Scotland (see; Moraineless Buchan)

Questions also have to be asked regarding the fate of previous human incursions. Doggerland appears to have been comparatively well populated with regard to coastal Europe of the time. It may well be simply due to the fact that it was rich in foodstuffs and easy living but, Who populated Doggerland?, has to be asked.

Were occupants of the interglacial periods removed from the gene-pool, or did they retreat by the same routes as they came? And did their descendants return?... which I think makes perfect sense, as it is inconceivable that each influx was new blood that came from some unexplained somewhere else!

Recent finds have put in question the established wisdom of the extinction of the Neanderthal in NW Europe. Analysis of a jawbone from Doggerland has been dated at 20,000 years b.p. as opposed to the commonly held 35,000 years.

40 years ago, I was being told at school that the human occupation of Britain was no more than 4-5,000 years old. Our knowledge of prehistory, the post-glacial period in particular, has come forward by leaps and bounds in the last 10 years, and I think we're on the cusp of a series of discoveries that will turn conventional wisdom on its head!
 
Recent finds have put in question the established wisdom of the extinction of the Neanderthal in NW Europe. Analysis of a jawbone from Doggerland has been dated at 20,000 years b.p. as opposed to the commonly held 35,000 years.
Do you have a source for this ?

Doggerland I know produces much the same type of artifacts as Starr Carr, but I hadn't heard of Neanderthal remains.

cheers,
Toddy
 
Hi Toddy, I knew it was coming, but disappointingly, I cannot find a source or link to this claim, try as I may.

I purchased "Europe's Lost World; The rediscovery of Doggerland." as a Christmas present for my brother in law and managed to read size-able chunks of it, without creasing the spine, before prising my own fingers from it and forcing myself to wrap the thing up. http://www.britarch.ac.uk/books/Gaffney2009

I have also, perhaps unwisely, read copious amounts on the topic from the internet, although my first concern is always the integrity of the site and that the info is from a reputable source.

The gist of my unsupported belief is that an amateur Dutch archaeologist has been haunting the country's fishing ports for a number of years and begging fishermen for artifacts netted from the seabed off Holland. As knowledge of these finds has spread, a market has developed and many artifacts are being sold on the quaysides so he has been forced to find funding from benefactors. Even so, he has reported having seen unique and immeasurably important artifacts vanish into private collections, including substantial parts of human, and on one occasion an intact Neanderthal skull. I believe it was a jawbone he submitted for carbon dating which provided the 20,000 (something) bp date.

If I do come up with a ref (I hope), I will let you know. In the meantime;

Doggerland;
http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.archaeology/2008-07/msg00136.html

Neanderthal;
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/about-us/news/2009/june/neanderthal-of-the-north-sea32888.html

Neanderthal
http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.anthropology.paleo/2008-03/msg00685.html

And finally, an example of the type of academic discussion to be avoided at all costs...
http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.anthropology.paleo/2008-03/msg00684.html
 
to throw a spanner in the works i once read that before humans knew how to make fire they used to use it from natural causes such as lightning and volcanos, they would then carry the burning log to where they could use it safely. so perhaps we should carry a lightning conductor instead or as well or go lava dipping :-D
 
I think there's a heck of a lot of supposition about fire making tbh.

I do think that knowing how difficult it can be to reliably catch a spark, and keep it glowing, that something like a firedrill or a bowdrill that creates it's own *coal* is a much more reliably effective method in many areas.

*If* and it's a big if, you know that you can spark into *very* dry, fresh, flax fibre, or diocentrica or prepared fomes, then flint and pyrites is possible.
What if you don't have any of those dry ? And they didn't have central heating back then. The bowdrill or the fireplough or the firedrill will by friction alone, dry out it's own tip/hollow and subsequent fibres.

As for humans taking fire from a natural fire........maybe, maybe..........with a heck of a lot of courage and fear, or from lava ??? don't see that one myself. Waaaaay too stupid. I think those scenarios are from something like the Raquel Welch in a fur bikini type daydreams :D

cheers,
Toddy
 
Here we go back to North Rona....

One day a ship called at this island, always a cause of worry when there are pirates around. The captain and crew went into each house (all five of them) and put out the fires, much to the utter horror of the islanders.

He then miraculously relit a fire using two stones.

We do underestimate fire preserving...most societies seem to have gone next door when they needed a light. (or even the next village over) The Yaghan indians of Tierra del fuego did this, though they had iron pyrites (mined from once source and shipped all over) for firelighting.
 
i dunno whether this has already been said (some of these posts are huge!) but if i was a mesosomethingorother age bloke using a bow drill to light a fire and it snaps i wouldn't put it in a place where it will be nicely preserved for thousands of years, i would throw it on the fire i made with another bow drill / flint and fungi...
 
As for the "efficiency" of percussion over reciprocating friction the Pitts Rivers itself (the source of the provocative first post) says


"All over the world people light fires with sparks caused by striking flint and metal together. With this method, creating fire can take up to 30 minutes, most difficulties resulting from wind or damp tinder.Neolithic (10,000 - 4,000 years ago) sparking flints are the earliest evidence for humans lighting, rather than simply controlling, fires".

Personally, I believe we came out of Africa with the skills. Plants are in most places worth living in, suitable stones are not.

Hand drill or fire saw for the arid lands. When you migrate to a different climate use a thong or a bow like the Inuit etc. etc.

As has been said. if you are a stone technology culture you understand you use stone percussion. If you are bamboo based you use a fire saw.

If 4,000 years is the end of the Neolithic then we are already quite close to the fire piston since suggestive artifacts resembling these have been found in South India.

We must avoid linear thinking.
 
I think people are underestimating the technical abilities of our ancestors. The earliest remains of a bow are from the Stellmoor bows in Northern Germany c.10000 years old! I think using the bow to rotate a drill may well have come soon after this.

You do have to wonder. I need to make a hole, so I stick this flint to a stick, and spin it. That gets hot.... If I bend this stick, and tie it with cord, it spins faster, and gets hotter, so the fire bow drill is born.

Then along comes another bright spark, picks up bow, and sends a stick across the camp. 'Hey watch it, you could have someone's eye out with that!' and so the bow is born.

I do think you have to say the second they started working stone, they got sparks.

Now if you can find them using something that generated fiction before the stone age, fiction might stand a chance, otherwise flint wins.
 

BCUK Shop

We have a a number of knives, T-Shirts and other items for sale.

SHOP HERE