Greetings,
I've been puzzling over this for a week or so now.
I'm going to avoid the "problem subjects [...] such as politics, survivalism [...] and legal systems" but others may stray that way.
Draw up a log, throw another on the fire and harken.
My early introduction was a childhood living in a remote Suffolk farm, no electric or drainage, and as a youngster discovered S. H. Walker's "The Way to Camp", which I'd say is the most influential book I've ever read. (I have both versions now). Also around were the Air Ministry Survival Guides for Desert, Sea, Arctic and Jungle. Later (70s) came Seymour's Self Sufficiency. Lots of others, but these would be the key ones. And I practised, and made things and broke things and mended them (or took them apart for "bits") and developed a natural "Use It Up, Wear It Out, Make It Do, or Do Without" way of being. And "Bushcraft" seemed to be interwoven with that. Knowledge and understanding of the environment, society and the objects therein. Working with the materials directly.
I frequently browse the fora here for specific information, or follow particular posters whose experience seems relevant and informed - but hadn't noticed that a discontinuity between Bushcraft and day-to-day life was developing. Obviously, if you're stuck in an urban environment then superficially there's not going to be an immediate match (more of a Clipper lighter (/pun) ) - but actually one has to contend with exactly the same requirements: Food and drink, shelter, warmth and the rest of the Maslow base layers too. (perhaps I should market fleeces under the Maslow brand as a "base layer?) It's just the tools and materials that change.
The discontinuity I notice is the complicit acceptance of the often explicit End User License Agreement. (I used to work in IT so these were my day-to-day terms of engagement. ) And it seems that EULA, in society as in software is non-negotiable.
I posted recently asking for suggestions for a functionally oriented vehicle, and in passing gave the reason why I was looking to change; a failure of a sensor is taken to mean the failure of the sensed item - without any further discussion. It really was an example of a "because I say so" - the I being "the regulations". And the feedback I received, both by PM and on the thread suggested that others actually found that acceptable and a reasonable trade-off.
Bushcraft, I thought, was about understanding and using the materials and our tools, hands and brains. We're about to stop the sale of knives on-line, and I saw a pack of six spoons in Asda that could not be sold to under eighteen year olds. SPOONS????
And we've become complicit in the acceptance of the "expert" - the person who sees the world through their laptop screen and regulates our lives.
I was taken to task (off-thread) for paraphrasing Martin Niemoller with
I've thought more about this, and came to the conclusion that I was right - we must surely, by our actions, speak out against the unreal veneer and touch the natural world, with our dangerous carving knives and nights away from the civilised dormitory. Isn't this what Bushcraft teaches us and enables? Or is it just a hobby to be ridiculed in TV adverts for a broadband provider. The irony that it was for a purveyor of experience through a screen is delicious - but perhaps quite perceptive from their side too.
/me stops wittering and listens ...
I've been puzzling over this for a week or so now.
I'm going to avoid the "problem subjects [...] such as politics, survivalism [...] and legal systems" but others may stray that way.
Draw up a log, throw another on the fire and harken.
My early introduction was a childhood living in a remote Suffolk farm, no electric or drainage, and as a youngster discovered S. H. Walker's "The Way to Camp", which I'd say is the most influential book I've ever read. (I have both versions now). Also around were the Air Ministry Survival Guides for Desert, Sea, Arctic and Jungle. Later (70s) came Seymour's Self Sufficiency. Lots of others, but these would be the key ones. And I practised, and made things and broke things and mended them (or took them apart for "bits") and developed a natural "Use It Up, Wear It Out, Make It Do, or Do Without" way of being. And "Bushcraft" seemed to be interwoven with that. Knowledge and understanding of the environment, society and the objects therein. Working with the materials directly.
I frequently browse the fora here for specific information, or follow particular posters whose experience seems relevant and informed - but hadn't noticed that a discontinuity between Bushcraft and day-to-day life was developing. Obviously, if you're stuck in an urban environment then superficially there's not going to be an immediate match (more of a Clipper lighter (/pun) ) - but actually one has to contend with exactly the same requirements: Food and drink, shelter, warmth and the rest of the Maslow base layers too. (perhaps I should market fleeces under the Maslow brand as a "base layer?) It's just the tools and materials that change.
The discontinuity I notice is the complicit acceptance of the often explicit End User License Agreement. (I used to work in IT so these were my day-to-day terms of engagement. ) And it seems that EULA, in society as in software is non-negotiable.
I posted recently asking for suggestions for a functionally oriented vehicle, and in passing gave the reason why I was looking to change; a failure of a sensor is taken to mean the failure of the sensed item - without any further discussion. It really was an example of a "because I say so" - the I being "the regulations". And the feedback I received, both by PM and on the thread suggested that others actually found that acceptable and a reasonable trade-off.
Bushcraft, I thought, was about understanding and using the materials and our tools, hands and brains. We're about to stop the sale of knives on-line, and I saw a pack of six spoons in Asda that could not be sold to under eighteen year olds. SPOONS????
And we've become complicit in the acceptance of the "expert" - the person who sees the world through their laptop screen and regulates our lives.
I was taken to task (off-thread) for paraphrasing Martin Niemoller with
First they came for my ABS light and I did not speak out because I believed that others knew best,
I've thought more about this, and came to the conclusion that I was right - we must surely, by our actions, speak out against the unreal veneer and touch the natural world, with our dangerous carving knives and nights away from the civilised dormitory. Isn't this what Bushcraft teaches us and enables? Or is it just a hobby to be ridiculed in TV adverts for a broadband provider. The irony that it was for a purveyor of experience through a screen is delicious - but perhaps quite perceptive from their side too.
/me stops wittering and listens ...