That's because Mary asked us to stick to the facts rather than air our opinions about him.
My opinion about him is still available if you care to search for it but I can still freely say that he is the spawn of a very low form of human life. That is a fact.
Indeed...
Sir Michael Grylls lead a very 'interesting' life prior to his death in 2001.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2001/feb/24/guardianobituaries.obituaries
That is fact. It's also factual to say the Edward Michael (Bear) Grylls is his son.
I think it's reasonable to note that in the Guardians obituary they note that Sir Michael " is survived by his wife, Sally, and a daughter and son."
The Jounalist makes a wise decision not to mention that the son in this case is also argueably well known.
I'd say use of the phrase very 'low form of Human life' might not be shared by people that knew or loved the man. So might not be 100% factual but folk reading can make their own minds up on that.
What I take from your post Wayland which says:
What do you expect from the spawn of a corrupt politician?
It's not going to be truth or accuracy is it.
Is fundamentally that because Sir Michael Grylls didn't tell the truth that his son doesnt tell the truth.
I'd ask outside of the medium of TV and TV production is that Factual??
Is the man not the TV star a liar?
I've never met Bear Grylls, I've watched his TV programmes, Read the wikipedia entry thats about it. I cannot honestly say if the bloke is a liar or not. I think that he probably realises that his time in the spotlight is in reality going to be pretty short and he makes the most of that and markets himself accordingly.
Is that a crime? Possibly to some and not to others...
I'd say as long as the TV show remains popular and Diverse / Discovery keep making it interesting and Bushcraft Expeditions keep providing survival consulatancy then Bear and the show are going to be around for a good while..
Cheers
John