Quite a number of owners have been taken to court and received prison sentences...If owners faced a prison sentence because their dog mauled a kid instead of just having their dog put down it would make dangerous dogs less desirable and pre-emptively encourage responsible ownership. As it stands it's only the dogs and the victims that pay the price for bad ownership and banning breeds after they've done harm won't change that.
Banning dangerous breeds ensures they're only available to people who are prepared to break the law, making them more dangerous. Make the owners accountable for the actions of their dogs. If owners faced a prison sentence because their dog mauled a kid instead of just having their dog put down it would make dangerous dogs less desirable and pre-emptively encourage responsible ownership. As it stands it's only the dogs and the victims that pay the price for bad ownership and banning breeds after they've done harm won't change that.
Banning dangerous breeds ensures they're only available to people who are prepared to break the law, making them more dangerous. Make the owners accountable for the actions of their dogs. If owners faced a prison sentence because their dog mauled a kid instead of just having their dog put down it would make dangerous dogs less desirable and pre-emptively encourage responsible ownership. As it stands it's only the dogs and the victims that pay the price for bad ownership and banning breeds after they've done harm won't change that.
That would be a right old laugh!!!!I really really want to walk down the high street with a slavering Hyena on a leash watch those bullies run.
Very very briefly!
I think it's more nuanced than just labelling a breed as 'dangerous and that's all there is to it'. They are highly trainable and given the right conditions can be fine in society. It's just that their requirements are often not met.Agreed, let's have tigers, panthers, lions, bears ..... as well!
A dangerous animal is a dangerous animal - these dogs have fighting and aggression in their DNA. They must be removed from society IMO.
I think it's more nuanced than just labelling a breed as 'dangerous and that's all there is to it'. They are highly trainable and given the right conditions can be fine in society. It's just that their requirements are often not met.
I'm not necessarily saying a ban on breeding is a bad thing, just that there is more to a dog's behaviour than breed-specific traits.
Yeah, I agree supressing it is a bad idea. Though, I do think those traits have the potential to be expressed in a more positive way if the dog is handled responsibly.Agreed, but these dogs have been bred for one purpose only; you're not going to train that out of them, you may be successful in supressing it - but that in itself is dangerous.
Yeah, I agree supressing it is a bad idea. Though, I do think those traits have the potential to be expressed in a more positive way if the dog is handled responsibly.
No doubt certain breeds have potential aggressive tendencies and higher requirements, but handled correctly can become well rounded animals and function well in society.
As with a lot of these debates, I think there is plenty of middle-ground which is worth exploring.