I'm struggling to give this context, because Fiona said in her OP that....
It leads on from the threads about the man that died tryng to live off the land in the scotish highlands. I am doing it mainly to help those that wish to go to the wilds and live off the land. It is to show it is not easy to live off the land, it is very hard work.
To my mind, things like building and maintaining a shelter, hunting for and processing a firewood, looking for potable water, trying to stay warm and dry, lack of good sleep etc, make a huge difference to how much time and energy you have available to forage in the woods for wild food. What I'm saying, and I think it's a fair observation - is that foraging on the sea shore is very different to foraging in the woods. Having transport, either a bycicle or bus, to travel from base to foraging location also doesnt reflect the reality of living in the woods. If you were living wild under a tarp and you wanted to travel a 16 mile round trip for food, you'd have to walk. It'd take you all day at least and by the time you got back, you'd have to then start thinking about getting dry, making a fire, looking for firewood and water etc. That's very different in terms of the impact to a person, than going home into a warm house with hot and cold running water, a roof, a soft bed, a kitchen with a kettle and a cooker. That's aside from cheats like hot chocolate, bovril, oxo, stored chestnuts and acorn flour. What Fiona is doing, is experimenting with a wild food diet at home, which is definitely fascinating in it's own right, no question. But I'm struggling to to give it context for someone living in the woods trying to survive of the wild food they find there, on a moment to moment basis like the lad who died on Rannoch Moor. I think that's a fair observation, dont you?
Or to put it another way, If Fiona manages some amazing and varied concoctions, with mussels and welks, herbs and plants, washed down with hot bovril, does that mean a bushcrafter could expect to achieve the same living off the woods? My concern is that it might actually present an unrealistically optimistic view of wild food availability, which might actually encourage the notion that wonderful things are possible, which is the opposite of the risks Fiona was trying to highlight. See?