BIG-TARGET
Nomad
How about this for dubious value for money:
http://www.bayleyknife.com/bear.htm
Stick with BRK&T, J. Neilson, or Ernest Emerson. a better value for the moola!!!

How about this for dubious value for money:
http://www.bayleyknife.com/bear.htm
How about this for dubious value for money:
http://www.bayleyknife.com/bear.htm
I just mean the look of it, looks like it would be on the belt of one of the village people.
Thats exactly the comments generated on Bladeforums. It's not a bad knife but it's like the woodlore with a greatly inflated price for the name - should be about 100 quid or so.And the Grylls knife looks like a good design to me, and top materials are being used. A little pricey though
As for Fred Flinstone's bread knife, what can I say? Perhaps Damien Hirst could pretend he made them and bump the price up to a million.![]()
$900. . .![]()
The "Gigantosaur" this has to be the most expensive and useless "tactical" knife I have ever seen. How useful would that blade be eh? lmao.
https://dstactical.com/product_info.php?products_id=828 :theyareon
![]()
How about this for dubious value for money:
http://www.bayleyknife.com/bear.htm
I think I can tell you why and of course this is merely my views, but I think it has been echo'd by others on here:I was wondering why it is that this knife is getting such reaction? Is it because it offends our sense of esthetic, it is the price, is it the design that we see as pretty useless for our purpose? Or any other reasons? For me, my first reaction waslooks ugly. I think it's meant to look "reptilan" and a art piece destined to be a drawer queen.