Woodlore knife on ebay.

Aug 4, 2003
365
0
47
Hatfield, Herts
Its a belt sheath not the neck carry. just checked on Ray's site, and its £165, bit of a bargin wouldn't you say. Which is where the picture comes from funnily enough.

ATB
Simon
 

Adi007

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
Sep 3, 2003
4,080
0
The early version were the ones with the extra-thirsty maple handle that warped when exposed to water. Although WS seem willing to accept them back, I think I'd pass anyway ...

Remember, in an auction, you win by paying the most!!! :shock:
 

maddave

Full Member
Jan 2, 2004
4,177
39
Manchester UK
I always find it quite amusing how, with the sophistication of even cheap digi cameras nowadays, some pictures on ebay look as though they've took the time and effort to smear the lens with vaseline in the hope to blag the potential bidders. Whenever I advertise something, I always put any flaws in the description and try to highlight them with photo's

Honesty is always the best policy :)
 

Adi007

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
Sep 3, 2003
4,080
0
:rolmao:

maddave said:
some pictures on ebay look as though they've took the time and effort to smear the lens with vaseline in the hope to blag the potential bidders.
 

Martyn

Bushcrafter through and through
Aug 7, 2003
5,252
33
59
staffordshire
www.britishblades.com
I hope I'm wrong about this, but I've just recieved my WS maple woodlore replacement blade today. It came directly from WS and was wrapped without a sheath (everyone who bought one of the first run, already has a sheath, so no need for a replacement). It came with a pre-paid envelope containing a cardboard sheath for the return of the faulty knife. I sincerely hope this individual hasn't decided to put his on ebay - if that's the case, I think that's a disgusting abuse of good will and trust. I would urge people to take steps to satisfy themselves this is NOT the case before bidding on this knife. If it is one of the first batch, not only will it have a less-than-functional handle, but you will be acquiring it dishonestly.

I may be wrong, I hope I am and if I am I apologise unreservedly.

But it does explain the absence of a sheath.
 

Adi007

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
Sep 3, 2003
4,080
0
Good point Martyn ... hadn't thought about that. If it is he is selling it before he's had his replacement as the Feb batch was the first set of replacements.

BTW, what's the new one like???? :-D Got it wet yet? I understand the new ones come with a certificate or something.
 

Adi007

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
Sep 3, 2003
4,080
0
Any mention why there's no sheath? Brand new knife yet the sheath is lost ... hmmmm

Stew said:
TAHAWK said:
If he's "borrowing" the pic, does he have the goods?

He does have a pic of the proper thing, as I asked him out of curiosity (I don't want it). It's a bit blurry so doesn't look as good as the pic he's using.
 

Martyn

Bushcrafter through and through
Aug 7, 2003
5,252
33
59
staffordshire
www.britishblades.com
Whether it's dodgy or not, it has to be one of the first issue knives. The original price is £165. Subtract £40 for the sheath, that leavs £125. The current bid is £112. For a knife with a potentially sub-standard handle, it's hardly a bargain.
 

Stew

Bushcrafter through and through
Nov 29, 2003
6,610
1,405
Aylesbury
stewartjlight-knives.com
Well the bidding has ended. It finished at £77. I asked the seller what happened to the sheath and I got a response about an hour before it ended saying he sold it to his mate who had lost his!

So what do you reckon, £77 for a (potentially dodgy) WS woodlore knife. Do you think it's worth it, considering that you could fit your own handle slabs?
 

Martyn

Bushcrafter through and through
Aug 7, 2003
5,252
33
59
staffordshire
www.britishblades.com
If he paid £165 for it and it's unused, why would he sell it for £77? Unless of course he's had, or is expecting a replacement. Why would he sell his sheath, leaving his own knife without one? Why didn't his mate just buy a new sheath from woodlore? Sounds fishy to me. There is nothing wrong with the blade on these, but if somone asked me to rehandle it, I'd flatly refuse. As they should all be returned to WS and so, there should be no "dodgy handled" versions in circulation.
 

Adi007

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
Sep 3, 2003
4,080
0
Martyn, are WS picking up the tab for insured post back, or does it have the potential to "get lost in the post"?

Seems dodgy to me, especially considering WS wouldn't have to honor any warranty on the knife ...

Someone's going to have a real surprise when it get's wet!
 

Martyn

Bushcrafter through and through
Aug 7, 2003
5,252
33
59
staffordshire
www.britishblades.com
Adi007 said:
Martyn, are WS picking up the tab for insured post back, or does it have the potential to "get lost in the post"?

Seems dodgy to me, especially considering WS wouldn't have to honor any warranty on the knife ...

Someone's going to have a real surprise when it get's wet!

Yup, postage paid by WS.

You know *all* the first issue were recalled and replaced, unless this guy has refused his replacement and decided he want to keep the original, then this knife *must* be one of those that has been recalled and replaced by WS. I was very high on the list of the first issue, I've been told by WS that they are replaced according to the original order list. So the batch that went out to me and a few others, was the first lot of replacements. This knife was on ebay before any of the replkacements had been issued. Ergo, it's one of those that has been recalled - no question.

The question I'd be asking the guy is "hasn't WS recalled all the first issue of these knives?"
 

BCUK Shop

We have a a number of knives, T-Shirts and other items for sale.

SHOP HERE