In a survival situation, you'll obviously want to use all resources available to you. If you've managed to catch an animal, its blood is definitely one such resource. However, in survival manuals I've come across, if they mention blood, they say not to drink it, as it will dehydrate you. Other sources, found through Google, on the other hand, say other things.
Now, I do think that the survival manuals have some sort of point. Blood is probably not good for rehydration. There's quite a lot of salt, and quite a lot of protein, and all that will require water for the body to process it. However, my question isn't whether blood will hydrate you; it's whether it will actually dehydrate you. There's a big difference.
Drinking a liter of sea water, your body will supposedly need about 1,3 liters of water to process the salts. That will leave you with a net loss of 0,3 liters. Blood is approximately 3/4's water; will processing the remaining fourth of salt and cells require significantly more water than what's already in the blood, dehydrating you, or merely leave you with a negligible amount of excess water (or a negligible amount of lost water, considering the nourishment from the blood)?
Now, I do think that the survival manuals have some sort of point. Blood is probably not good for rehydration. There's quite a lot of salt, and quite a lot of protein, and all that will require water for the body to process it. However, my question isn't whether blood will hydrate you; it's whether it will actually dehydrate you. There's a big difference.
Drinking a liter of sea water, your body will supposedly need about 1,3 liters of water to process the salts. That will leave you with a net loss of 0,3 liters. Blood is approximately 3/4's water; will processing the remaining fourth of salt and cells require significantly more water than what's already in the blood, dehydrating you, or merely leave you with a negligible amount of excess water (or a negligible amount of lost water, considering the nourishment from the blood)?