Those are really good photos for getting identification from. You have fruit, leaves, stems, and they all look like they are in a hedgerow, so location too.
Granted you might not be expected to recognise sloe, but not knowing elder or rose?!? Come on
...that isn't just "not a wild edibles expert"
. Both elder and rose are very common, even in suburban settings. Elder has many uses and qualities, and roses find their way into a lot of gardens and plantings.
Seriously
, get yourself some plant books, Collins do some good ones, and just have fun reading and taking them with you when you go out. See what you can identify as you go. It makes walking through the countryside so much nicer when you know what the plants around you are, and their qualities, rather than them all being just green scenery. It also gives you a leg up on a lot of bushcraft skills, from building fires, to fire lighting, to carving, to making cordage, as well as foraging. Fun as this thread is, you will get more from diving into a book than you do from polling the forum.
If that isn't enough. If you have pre-loaded your recognition system, you will be much better prepared to make quick judgements on whether to snap up a bit of wood for the smoker as and when they appear, without going through the loop of photographs, posting and awaiting consensus.
As for picking stuff because it looks nice...examples of stuff that looks good...but isn't...
Woody Nightshade
Black Bryony
Deadly Nightshade.
http://www.countrylovers.co.uk/wfs/wfsberries.htm
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gardeni...arden-safety-pretty-but-poisonous-plants.html
Good luck!
Chris