A quick quibble......to those who would disparage a people who successfully colonised and thrived in the high arctic......they were anything but primitive.
Humanity only existed there because it was inovative and creative with what could be considered sparse resources. That's not primitive; that's skill and craftsmanship of high refinement.
The archaeological record is preferentially biased towards non organic preservation. The investigation and interpretation of those scant remains reveals a culturally rich society.
Toddy
Humanity only existed there because it was inovative and creative with what could be considered sparse resources. That's not primitive; that's skill and craftsmanship of high refinement.
The archaeological record is preferentially biased towards non organic preservation. The investigation and interpretation of those scant remains reveals a culturally rich society.
Toddy
Last edited: