Realgar said:
Elms apparently go through a boom and bust cycle with elm disease - it'sbeen around longer than the newspaper article suggests. The beetles only go for trees above a certain size which is why you get the hedgerow elm thing of sprouting from the the base and then dying back a few years later.
I think some of the replanting is ill advised - they're making the same mistake as was made with the trees in the first place - planting everything from a small number of clones, they might be disease resistant at the moment but it won;'t take much change from the whole homogenous population to get wiped out again.
They'll be back - it's just that many won't be of a decent size in our lifetime though I can point you to a local spot that does still have healthy elms that are nice if not the mindblowing things that used to dominate the horizon in some parts,
Realgar
the sad fact is that most of the English elm population is more or less identical. EE hardly ever produces viable seeds, it mostly propagates through root layering and suckering, and spread mainly through planting by landowners from the middle ages onward, which is why it was hit so hard.
wych elm will produce viable seed and has hung on in the higher rainfall in the west in isolated pockets, but the DED is still about.
When I was DED officer in E Sussex 20 years back we did a census of elm repopulation and came up with a figure which suggested that there was between 2 and 3 times
more elm in the county than there was some 20 years prior , before DED. The main problem is that elms are now small hedgerow trees, having more in common with hazel and the like rather than with oak.
I have around a ton of planked elm in my garage, waiting to be made into furniture.