This is such a fine piece of arrogance. You're "sorry" which means actually you're not and you think you know without researching the matter or at least reading the supporting material that I did link.
How do you think Nansen and Johanassen managed when over-wintering on a remote island with only meat (fat and lean) to eat after the dash for the Pole?
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Farthest-North-Fridtjof-Nansen/dp/1602392374/
Scott's men would still have been alive if he'd taken notice of Nansen's experience and of the experience of native peoples. Instead he listened to the superstitions of the European medical men of the day, who unfortunately were going on guesswork not experience. What you must have is fresh food. Freshly-killed undercooked meat, which is what Nansen (and Amundsen after) used, is fine.
How do you think the Eskimo and Canadian Indians managed for millenia in a climate where nothing much grows for months at a time and what there is is buried under snow and ice?
Link
And the fur trade. Here was, as I said, the equivalent of a a billion-dollar business today running on the basis of pemmican. That's what the voyageurs portering the furs out and doing harder work than you or I have ever dreamed of were living on for months at a time. But, of course, you don't need to take account of that, because you know better even though your claim is counter to historical fact.
It's fine for camping. It's not just the same as pemmican, which was what you were ignorantly implying in your previous post. It's not made withs specific proportions of fat to lean; it's treated with "corns" of curing salt (hence the name); it's cooked.