I've been using
Collins Complete British Trees, but it hasn't helped much
It is a good book though.
G
My problem now is that I've run out of available references that I can use. I don't know tree barks so I'm going from a standing start. I have one or two tree books at home but, as I suspect for the majority of basic guides, bark isn't often used as a primary ID - it's normally leaves /flowers /fruit. There are some good tree ID web sites,
some include
some pictures of bark, but in general they follow the primary IDs used by books: leaves /flowers /fruit. Google images produces some results but I haven't had great success there. If I had a day to spare, I'd print off the piccys and take them into the Radcliffe Science Library in Oxford because I'm sure that they will have lots of reference tomes there.
I've tried some statistical analysis of the answers so far and Red's hints but it's like one of those logic problems where there isn't quite enough information to get the answer. As Rich tried to do, we need some more data if we are going to solve it by logic. And solving by logic doesn't really teach me anything about tree identification.
I'm now getting to the limit of my knowledge and I'm tempted now just to do what I can to help anyone get a solution. I'd like to win the prize, but I don't want to get into the situation where I put in loads of effort to find the answer and then get annoyed because someone else beat me to it. In the end, Red's competition has provided me with entertainment, and I will hopefully learn something from it.
When I play board games, I just like playing them for the experience, and winning or otherwise doesn't matter to me. Right from my school days, I've always been good at what I do but there has always been someone better than me, and the philosophy propounded by the modern world of always trying to be best, and that you have failed if you aren't the best, has made it difficult for me at times. So my philosophy now is that I owe it myself and my family to try hard, but that second best is often good enough, and in most cases is still a very good achievement.
I'd better climb down from the psychiatrist's couch now and think some more about this problem.
Geoff