Cats Protection and other cat charities already do a lot of this.Who will be doing this and how will they be funded?
< Just asking>
As for the rest, perhaps the polluter- big arable- should be paying for the damage it does especially to insect life.....
..... big difference between big cereal arable and family farms/veg growers. Big arable is profitable and not interested in reducing inputs. Did a project a few years back using drones to do 100% multispectral imaging at resolution of 2cm/pixel, flying 50Ha in 40 minutes. Idea being that it spots problems at early stage and enables spot treatment (using drones) not blanket use of fertiliser, pesticides and herbicides. Successful proof of concept but the farm estate who let us trial it (at our cost) wasn't interested as they harvest the crop, dry it, stick it in a temperature/humidity controlled barn and wait until the price is right to sell. So savings from input reduction didn't interest them enough to go as far as paying our expenses for the next stage of a productionisation trial.
World of a different between big arable vs smaller family farm size regenerative systems which use animals to help increase biodiversity.
GC
