I really dislike the fishtail parka, too much like Oasis style of clothing (Oasis being a Mancunian band I thought was oveerrated and more than a little annoying from the so called Britpop era).
I saw a Didrikson parka that looked ok and about the right insulation, until I saw the fishtail parka bit and ruled it out. No idea why I am so against them. It is not rational perhaps.
Mind you there is one point against that one, it isn't waterproof. I live in Cumbria, Unfortunately if it is not raining turn around and look again, it will be!! At least in the season I would or could wear such an insulated jacket. It does seem that the more military styled jackets come a bit cheaper than the civilian style ones. It makes me think that basic / functional is not what the civilian inspired outdoor brands do, too much extras and marketing to get a higher price!
I am still trying to understand who needs a Canada Goose parka at £1300 or greater!!! Why is a £450 Fjallraven parka better than a £270 Didrikson one? why is is the CG £1300 one better than the £450 Fjellraven onr? Seriously stupid people buying into the Canada Goose label in this country. I once saw a news reporteer for the BBC interview a young man on the street to get their POV on how the younger generation can not afford to live and save a deposit for a house these days. This early 20s guy wass saying that they are really struggling whilst wearing a Canada Goose Parka that would have been a good start on a rental deposit!! Made me laugh as I don't think the reporter realised thee guy had money to burn like that. I digress.