Experience isn't the only thing that can reduce cost. Specialising and limiting choices can also help reduce the cost of manufacture, allowing a maker to sell for a lower price and still make the necessary profit.
There are plenty of videos about this. Instead of offering many products, offer just one or two. Don't offer many different designs, or materials. If you only have one size, in two colours and two finishes, you can set up a much more efficient process than if you accept everything from organisers to archery equipment.
All that lets you limit the set up time, you can have stations set up for your limited process, not needing to repeat set-up helps with speed.
Paul,
I am not sure that your question is answerable.
"I'm trying to understand the craft and true value it should have versus the value it has possibly due to mass produced, cheaper stuff."
"true value" of a thing is totally subjective. Do you place more value on a leather binder that has been hand stitched, or machine stitched? Both could be made by a sole craftsman, both could be done in a factory. Do you place more value on a binder that was made, to a standard pattern just for you, than one that was made to the same pattern in a batch and put on a shelf awaiting orders? What about the processes, edges that are hand sanded and hand rubbed vs using a belt sander and buffer/power burnisher? Two items could be made to exactly the same spec, one by a solo craftsman and one in a factory, using largely the same processes. (In knives, Bark River Tools is a bit like this, its a factory, but an awful lot of the processes are done by hand, as they would be in a single person shop), the solo shop version could be twice the price and be a fair price for time and materials. How do you value the difference? Is there a difference? In the actual product there may be no objective difference, so is the solo hand made version a rip off? That craftsman could be earning less per hour than the person in the factory.