I'm now on the intermediate / advanced course in Bromley and am so far
resisting the move to a better bow. Everyone points out that the cheapy
training bows are a bit rubbish (and I'd be the first to agree) but the more
high tech ones with proper sights and counterbalance sticks (the long
thin tube that sticks out at the front - no idea what it's called) seem
to me to be like... well, cheating!
The tutor hires these bows inexpensively so the cost isn't an issue and
I might try one out just for the sake of trying something different. I agree
that the training bows are a bit inconsistent as it surely can't all be me
I've had a few good shots with nicely grouped arrows, a few hits in the
gold but still plenty of arrows going their own sweet way in any direction.
Might have to make my own bow
That way I'll be using the same bow
each week (for consistency) and it won't be overly adorned with technical
features.
Will I learn more from one of these modern bows? - in which case I might
as well transfer? I don't want to be precious about it
Also, I like the notion of the bow as being a 'stick that is nine tenths broken'
but it occurred to me that the mind of whoever first said it might have been
operating in a decimal world. Perhaps not of course, as we've been
dividing things into ten from day one I should think. I did wonder if there
might have been an older phrase based on sixteenths or some older
measurement though
"a stick that is fourteen and a half sixteenths broken" would be the equivalent...