The series is designed to show people failing...puts me off to be honest.
That's why I dismissed the show at first, until I was encouraged to watch it. Sometimes it seems that ever show now is designed to show people people failing...
And there is also the bit about making a competition out of something I love. That's hard to take.
Nevertheless, I have found the show informative in seeing how ten people with skills and equipment developed in other places actually make out on the coast. I was expecting fire lighting issues but not from 5 out of 10, given that they had shelter, warm clothing and time to learn. And on and on..
The thing that is most surprising me at this point with the four remaining, is why they aren't working themselves crazy making shelters of split logs - shingled if necessary - since they've had a short sample of what heavy rains will be like. I thought that Alan's cook camp was a darned good idea, but shingled branches don't work too well in real rain and a cook camp can also serve as a good work and drying area with fire. Mitch seems to have good skills and attitude, but if my gear was growing mould, I think I'd be in a rush to make a proper covered shelter with a good fire to dry stuff out instead of using a clothes line in a damp forest.
I find the psychological aspect interesting because the common stories of surviving, "Hatchet", "Brian's Winter", "My side of the Mountain" were written by people who didn't get lonely. Paulsen was a trapper for many years, and Jean George a field biologist. Tommy Tomkins was a wildlife photographer when he gave up police work, so he'd spend long periods alone in the wild, then spend the rest of the year visiting schools and showing his movies. The kids would always ask about loneliness and he say that while he got lonely while travelling and staying in motels, he never had time to get lonely in the wild.
Anybody seeing a problem with the coho salmon?