No, I was interested to see what I'd missed in terms of fire. "I must have missed stuff. Could you point me to the show and time, please? I saw no evidence of fire.". Lack of fire is a huge consideration if half the contestants failed due to lack of being able to start a fire. If that wasn't the case, then it's really important.
The extra stuff shown is a bit of a contentious issue. Yep pots and pans don't come floating over. The problem is what are you going to hunt on the actual coastline other than marine stuff like seal and sea lion (taken out by boat)? You hunt deer on the clear-cuts where they're easy and you just have to haul them to your vehicle on one of the many haul roads, so I'm wondering about "abandoned hunting camps". I've been figuring that someone has been into native camps which aren't exactly abandoned but seasonal for fishing or hunting - and you'll find those wherever rivers or big creeks enter the ocean - that plentiful. Taking stuff is contentious and complicated to discuss - going much further than any show rules. If you want to hear my story about my transgression 40 years ago, just down the coast from there fine, though soon I'm off for a while. Basically, though, finding stuff can have all sorts of implications, the discussion of which which doesn't belong here.
But my apologies if you thought that I was defensive or contradicting what you said. I wasn't, but may have appeared so. The trouble with a show like this, is that it's important because it gives details of how people make out stuck in one spot. That's really important because most people who found themselves dropped off on that coastline would obviously walk out. So this show is the best information we have. The native people took a very structured approach to colonizing the coast, and so quite different.