Ref?
Quote?
Authority?
Science?
It was a deliberately inflammatory and arguably inaccurate headline to attract readers. It is true that some people have been required to remove installed aircon units which do not fit with their specific local planning rules and interpretations. It is a very uneven and specialised legal playing field. To claim they are being ripped out is a gross and inaccurate representation.
Within London boroughs there are local planning laws and standards layered on top of the building regulations as enacted by the London Mayors office. Councils have their own differing standards, interpretations and focus, driven largely by political agendas. Arguably this is supposed to reflect their electorates wishes, per the ballot box.
Across the rest of the UK are again, local requirements, but overlaying this are national planning and development rules requiring internal and external environmental performance standards for new developments and builds. This enables some architectural variation and choice by balancing and choosing alternative solutions. Some of those options might actually require a form of whole house aircon/heat recovery, whereas others might be naturally ventilated and heated.
If a new owner or the builder then ignores such standards and install or retro-fit say, localised window style aircons, (or in my business a stove/chimney) they may face legal removal enforcement. Air con units can be noisy, visually ugly and upset local neighbours. (As can some DIY stove/chimney installs!) Some aircon types can also be a health risk of air spreading of legionnaires disease and others ills and smells.
Whilst I have my own frustrations with them and political agenda or focus driving them, it is very unwise to try to ignore or deliberately go against what is effectively the law of the land.