Oh and now I am in full rant lets sort the CAP problem with the same system, we shall limit farm size and supermarket size instead of subsidising. Simply ban holdings above a certain size, different acreage's for upland and lowland farms, different again for dairy and we'll let proper mixed farms be a little bigger as that is how farming should be done the waste product of each part being the raw material for another rather than a pollutant for the taxpayer to sort out.
Bernard Mathew's turkey for Christmas anyone? Pah!
There that feels better I'll get my coat......
nice idea (specially as it would mean me amd mrs m could afford to buy a little place with a few acres
) but it'll never happen. The size of farms have been growing for well over 200 yrs now, it's a fundemantal tenant of free market economics when applied to agriculture.
I believe the french have/had a system whereby the state regulates the maximum size of farms (tho I suspect Sarkozy will do someting about that, if he's a true free marketeer) which was brought in after the revolution to break up the estates of the aristocracy so that they could be given to the peasants (it was also one of the reasons why inheritance tax was brought in in this country, so that tennant farmers could buy the land they had previously rented).
Anyway, I digress, a variation on the French system could work here (tho I'm doubtful) but the way agriculture is being run, as a business enterprise, dictates that size (and the attendant economies of scale size brings) is all important.
We also only need to look at soviet russia or mugabes zimbabwe to see what happens when the state intervenes in agriculture...