If a fox moves in means it moves in from ’somewhere’.
So one less fox ’somewhere’ that can kill.
Correct?
So one less fox ’somewhere’ that can kill.
Correct?
Gamekeepers are essentially farmers. The birds they grow are their crop. They grow them for a profit, just like ALL crops. And no, now all crops are food. I’ve been to tobacco farms, cotton farms, etc. that had nothing to do with food (including corn farms that were producing grain for alcohol).......
I know plenty of people will disagree with me but I think there is a huge difference between farmers (legally) keeping a pest species in check to protect their production of the UK's food supplies and gamekeepers killing relatively rare birds of prey so rich blokes can stand in line and blast driven birds out of the air for fun. Surely, in the 21st Century, we should be above chasing and killing for 'sporting pleasure' - there's nothing sporting about it. And to be clear, I do hunt, but whatever I shoot goes in the pot.....
I had an interesting conversation with a chap I work with who used to shoot down in Hertfordshire. He hadn't heard about this change since he quit shooting about 5 years ago. His immediate opinion was that this was something to do with shooters from Eastern Europe, who he said had a tendency to trespass and shoot anything that moved. His description of experiences in Hertfordshire with immigrant shooters was a bit of a shock, not something I had heard of before. People without licences, shooting pets, shooting protected species, using shotguns on deer, and at least one case where a poaching Pole pointed a gun at him and his friend when they went to find out who it was shooting on their patch without the farmer's knowledge.
I do wonder what the thinking is about justifying shooting as crop protection. When I was a teen, I used to sit up at a dew pond on a farm to shoot the occasional pigeon that came in to drink. I can see how it could be said that I wasn't doing much to protect crops, but since all the birds did feed on the farmer's crops, everyone was one fewer doing so. It will be a strange and sad situation if they change the law such that the only people able to shoot are those who are kitted out and capable of slaughtering large numbers of birds, rather than those that just pick off a few here and there.
With illegal guns then?
Deer is commonly shot with a shotgun in Sweden ( do not know about rest of the world)
Size US 1-4 I think I recall.
Is that not a shotgun with a 'slug' rather than a shot gun with 'shot' cartridges ?
In the England you cannot shoot Deer with 'shot'.
For Deer shooting we have minimum bullet size and minimum energy requirements - for most Deer a minimum of .243" is required (Chinese Water Deer & Muntjac can be shot with a .223)
http://www.thedeerinitiative.co.uk/uploads/guides/172.pdf
I use the 'good old 303'.
I imagine you mean US size 1- 4 buckshot rather than just 1 - 4 shot. Regular #4 shot is about right for ducks, geese and high flying birds. #2 is about right for turkey sized birds. #4 “buck” shot is usually used for riot control, and the most common for deer is #00 buckshot (each pellet is about 33 caliber with 9 pellets per cartridge.Shot. US size 1 to 4 I think I recall.
Of course, the distances are much shorter than with a rifle.
With a sabot or a slug in a properly rifled deer barrel (Yes, special purpose shotguns are manufactured with rifled barrels for deer hunting) range is up to 150 yards (some ammo makers advertise up to 200 yards but in reality that’s advertising hype)Shot. US size 1 to 4 I think I recall.
Of course, the distances are much shorter than with a rifle.
Have you ever had problems with badgers taking lambs?
Someone i know who hunts and is about farms mentioned before how foxes get a blame for a lot, but he thinks badgers are more likely to take a lamb than a fox.
I’ll stop after this quick answer. Yes a true rifle is better at longer ranges. Unfortunately rifles aren’t legal to hunt with in more heavily populated areas precisely because of their range. That’s where specialty shotguns come in (mimicking rifle performance at ranges greater than 100 yards but still less than 200 yards)I see no point in Sabots, except in anti Tank ammo.
Brenneke is used on short range, and is perfect there due to the nice size....
If you want to take deer on 150 meters, just use a rifle? More versatile imo.
That is the fun with guns and hunting, something to make everybody happy!