Where is it going

  • Hey Guest, Early bird pricing on the Summer Moot (29th July - 10th August) available until April 6th, we'd love you to come. PLEASE CLICK HERE to early bird price and get more information.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Toddy

Mod
Mod
Jan 21, 2005
38,966
4,616
S. Lanarkshire
Adi you raise lots of protests but give no examples that can actually be discussed :confused:
Modding is very like an iceberg; all you see on the surface is about 10% of the actual thing, and it's deceptive. You have no idea of what has gone on in the background and frequently the actions that have been taken will never have been seen (thankfully!) by more than one or two readers. Personally I would really prefer *not* to have to moderate some of the total innanities that have cropped up recently, but hey, that's life :rolleyes:

I make no apologies for the family nature of the forum, or for our efforts to keep it that way.
BB is a very good site, busy and active but intended for a very different participation.
I don't know of any other bushcraft site with a similar scope or membership to this one in the UK, though I do know of several other sites that would love to generate a fraction of the hits that BCUK achieves.There are some truly excellent and interesting primitive technology sites, though.

Cheers,
Toddy
 

MagiKelly

Making memories since '67
Adi Fiddler said:
Magikelly as i have said i for one am not going to let this become a slagging match between different people over different decisions.

I can not believe that you or anyone else have not seen the undertones of discontent in many of the threads.

I have seen it and i rarely take part in discussions.

I kind of see what you are saying but to be honest my opinion is that if you are going to open a can of worms open it the full way and get it all out and sorted. If I had seen people being banned unfairly or threads removed that I did not agree with I would be asking about them here, especially as we have a mod offering to explain the process.

Since I have not noticed I cannot. You have noticed so...............................................

To be honest I notice far more moderation over on BB than I do here. Perhaps that is due to the nature of the site or perhaps it is due to the threads I read :rolleyes:
 

Toddy

Mod
Mod
Jan 21, 2005
38,966
4,616
S. Lanarkshire
Jon Pickett said:
Hi Stuart........I had a light hearted humour thread on ducks removed because of someone else's comments on it, which in my mind wern't that bad, but why not remove them, not the whole thread. Then there was all the issues with Spoonys thread in which Running Bare gets frustrated and gets banned, though I may not know the half of it, so I can't really comment on that. This is just a couple of issues that have caused me personally some bad feelings recently.
I love this site and I owe a lot to people on it, but the modding is really heavy on here, compared with other forums I go on, like Wildabout britain (where they had no problem with my duck thread).
I use an analogy I used on another thread.......If the referee keeps on blowing the whistle all the time, then the players and the fans get frustrated, a flowing game is the best to watch...........
I am not having any diggs at you mods, but I do think some things are dealt a bit harshly. I am sorry to bring up the ducks again, Toddy will be moaning..............Jon

Too d*mn right I'm moaning.
The *lighthearted* thread degenerated into smutty schoolboy humour that sniggers at bras and knickers on a washing line. A real pity since the photos were excellent.

You want open-ness....well here it is

I really do not believe that this entire thread is being raised, causing stress and discontent, because you were half cut that night and ranted at me in pm's. You were well out of line, the thread had become pathetically puerile and did not add anything to the forum. Had you been calm and peaceful then I would probably have taken an hour or two of my time and sorted through it, redd out the dodgy posts and tidied everything up.
By that time in the morning I had had it. I sent the whole sorry mess to the modding discussion area having told you quite clearly that in the morning it would
be reviewed and if it seemed valid it might be re-instated.
It was; & it wasn't. Get over it and move along.

Toddy
 
  • Like
Reactions: gregorach and Goose

Stuart

Full Member
Sep 12, 2003
4,141
50
**********************
I apologise Adi, perhaps I am not making myself clear.

I am not asking you to degrade this discussion or enter a slagging match.

I am simply requesting that you explain the problems to which you refer rather than making vague references to over zealous moderators, fearful members, banned members and removed posts.

Give some examples of the above and I will do my best to explain the reasons behind any action taken.

You made reference to my actions being inappropriate, perhaps we could start there, then you need not make reference to anyone not already mentioned?

Your posts will not be removed and you have not broken any rules, provided that you continue to remain polite you will not be penalized.

There is nothing prohibited about requesting that the actions of a moderator be explained but in order to do so I need to know what the problem is.
 

Adi

Nomad
Dec 29, 2004
339
5
Toddy.

I moderate on a number of sites and i am the admin on others so i am quite aware how it is done, what goes on behind the sense and how hard some decisions are.

I am also quite aware that this is a family site and that rules need to be kept. I also understand and agree to why some resent action were taken by yourself with the childish goings on, for instance some of the things in you famous Duck thread but you decided to pull that thread without explanation. An explanation was not given until for a number of weeks after it was constantly brought up in other threads only then was an explanation offered. This is a prime example of what i am talking about. That lack of clear and honest communication caused a lot of mistrust amongst my members.
 

jamesoconnor

Nomad
Jul 19, 2005
357
5
46
Hamilton, lanarkshire
personally, i'm happy with what i'm getting from this forum. ok, i joined less than a year ago but i can say that i'm still getting as much enjoyment from it than the day i came across this site. thats why i'm still browsing the site most day's. ive not noticed a downturn in the site, but that maybe because i only look at the threads that interest me and i get information and satisfaction from them. you only get what you want from all things, and what i want from this site i get ( i hope i said that correctly) so there is nothing i'd change on bcuk, apart from a few more tutorials which i thoroughly enjoy.

regards
 

Adi

Nomad
Dec 29, 2004
339
5
by the way who brought up BB that has no relevance to BCUK.
I cant remember the last time i went to that site it complete rubbish.
 

Adi

Nomad
Dec 29, 2004
339
5
Toddy said:
You want open-ness....well here it is

I really do not believe that this entire thread is being raised, causing stress and discontent, because you were half cut that night and ranted at me in pm's. You were well out of line, the thread had become pathetically puerile and did not add anything to the forum. Had you been calm and peaceful then I would probably have taken an hour or two of my time and sorted through it, redd out the dodgy posts and tidied everything up.
By that time in the morning I had had it. I sent the whole sorry mess to the modding discussion area having told you quite clearly that in the morning it would
be reviewed and if it seemed valid it might be re-instated.
It was; & it wasn't. Get over it and move along.

Toddy

Here we go, Toddy is at it again giving it all with her opinion.

"Power happy" along with some of the other mods.


Maybe it is time for the Mods to step out of this discusion as they are so keen to degrade this thread.
 

Stuart

Full Member
Sep 12, 2003
4,141
50
**********************
Ok you have mentioned the Duck thread and Toddy has previously explained why she removed the thread after it had degenerated into juvenile posts about 'shagging' and Photoshop altered pictures of ducks enjoying post coital cigarettes etc

you contend that Toddy did not make it clear why she had removed the thread, that is a reasonable if minor issue and one explained by the fact that it was Toddys first actions undertaken as a new moderator and she was not yet fully experienced in the correct procedure, it takes time to learn the ropes in any job.

But this does not go any way to explaining your vague references to over zealous moderators, fearful members, banned members and removed posts

so I shall reiterate:

Give some examples of the above and I will do my best to explain the reasons behind any action taken.

You made reference to my actions being inappropriate, perhaps we could start there, then you need not make reference to anyone not already mentioned?

Your posts will not be removed and you have not broken any rules, provided that you continue to remain polite you will not be penalized.

There is nothing prohibited about requesting that the actions of a moderator be explained but in order to do so I need to know what the problem is.
 

MagiKelly

Making memories since '67
Adi Fiddler said:
by the way who brought up BB that has no relevance to BCUK.
I cant remember the last time i went to that site it complete rubbish.

I think it was Spamel but lets not get side tracked :)

Tell us what exactly the problem is, then we can get to fixing it.

It is said the world is ruled by those who turn up. This forum is the same, hell all forums are the same, they are shaped by the contributions. The moderators may be able to edit out posts but it is us, the members, that post in the first place. If you do not like the way the post are going start threads on the subjects you want to see covered. I like to see us working together to get good prices and reductions on kit using the advantage of numbers we have. So I have run a few group buys. Some people want to meet others in person and so they arrange meet ups.

Make BCUK what you want by positive posts to shape how it goes, or at least if you have a compliant be clear and say exactly what it is so that it can be addressed.

If you do not know precisely what you think is wrong what chance do the rest of us have?
 
  • Like
Reactions: scanker

JonnyP

Full Member
Oct 17, 2005
3,833
29
Cornwall...
Toddy said:
you were half cut that night and ranted at me in pm's. You were well out of line, the thread had become pathetically puerile and did not add anything to the forum. Had you been calm and peaceful then I would probably have taken an hour or two of my time and sorted through it,

Toddy
Toddy, I resent that comment, I have just been to look at the pm's I sent you and I was not ranting and certainly not out of line, and I was calm and peaceful, even though I had had a few sherberts that night, I just could not believe it was removed.
I have moved on from that, though the heavy moderating continues and I see others who are discontent and it sometimes affects me. I hate bringing this up as it is not good for others to see, but it needs to be said.............Jon
 

jamesoconnor

Nomad
Jul 19, 2005
357
5
46
Hamilton, lanarkshire
MagiKelly said:
It is said the world is ruled by those who turn up. This forum is the same, hell all forums are the same, they are shaped by the contributions. The moderators may be able to edit out posts but it is us, the members, that post in the first place. If you do not like the way the post are going start threads on the subjects you want to see covered. I like to see us working together to get good prices and reductions on kit using the advantage of numbers we have. So I have run a few group buys. Some people want to meet others in person and so they arrange meet ups.

Make BCUK what you want by positive posts to shape how it goes, or at least if you have a compliant be clear and say exactly what it is so that it can be addressed.

If you do not know precisely what you think is wrong what chance do the rest of us have?

well said. i wish i said that! :D
regards
james
 

British Red

M.A.B (Mad About Bushcraft)
Dec 30, 2005
26,714
1,960
Mercia
Adi,

I thought this thread started very well. I thought you voiced a balanced and reasoned concern. I agreed completely with Spamels first post (I still do).

I'm only a relative newcomer to this forum so I try to stay out of the politics as I know my place.

However you last "crack" at Toddy offends me - Toddy has been welcoming, friendly and very fair since I joined the forum - even sending me material to help me at her own expense. She has never been known to "give it all" in my experience.

If you genuinely believe you have the right to insult others directly and other forums directly and then ask for them to withdraw without defending themselves I think you are the one being unfair and not to say rude.

By all means criticise an event, but please leave out the insults and behave as the gentleman I know you to be

Red
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomtom

MagiKelly

Making memories since '67
Adi Fiddler said:
Here we go, Toddy is at it again giving it all with her opinion.

"Power happy" along with some of the other mods.


Maybe it is time for the Mods to step out of this discusion as they are so keen to degrade this thread.

Adi you really are doing your position no good at all. You want some undefined problems with the moderators solved but you do not want the moderators to explain their actions.

Getting right back to your first post. You said about members being banned and threads being removed. The implication being that this happened a lot. Please give one example of each. A banning and a thread removal so that we can use this as an example to see the process at work and do not say you do not want to start name calling. You have told Stuart he is part of the problem, said Toddy is "Power happy", so I think it is safe to say the ship has sailed on name calling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomtom

Adi

Nomad
Dec 29, 2004
339
5
Magikelly / Stuart there are lots of people on here that have over the last year have had to put up with unjust actions and aggressive pm's from moderators, if you are unaware of this you are lucky.

It is not my place to bring these to your attention because the people that received this treatment my feel they dont want it dragged up again. If they have experienced this treatment then it is down to them to express it here and to post the PM's they were sent here is the wish to.

Well done Jon this is just one case there have been lots of others but it down to the people that were involved to bring it up here if they wish to.

What i am saying is there is a problem people are quite frankly fed up with the treatment from some of the mods not all just some and the irony is those mods know who they are because they are trying to justify there actions.

A problem is, Tony is happy for others to do his bidding until he steps up and takes responsibility for his staff the problem is going to persist.
 

Martyn

Bushcrafter through and through
Aug 7, 2003
5,252
33
58
staffordshire
www.britishblades.com
Adi Fiddler said:
Where is BCUK going?

In my own opinion and many other peoples opinions BCUK has really taken a downwards turn.

Posts and entire threads are being removed by over zealous moderators to the point that personal opinions are now being removed. The entire membership, post with the fear that there post will be deleted and at worst they will be banned. It has even got to the stage where people are not able to expresses there own opinions any more. And, when people try to get good honest answers or express there disagreement with a decision made by the moderating team they are banned or the very least threatened.
Adi, this forum is owned by Tony. It isnt now, nor has it ever been a pretence of democracy. Tony and the moderator team work hard to do what Tony wishes with the site. The direction and decisions made about this site, are his and his alone. He does take counsel, but from people of his choosing.

I'm not being agressive, or dismissive, just simply stating the facts. The decisons made here are not democratic one, they never have been and never will be. The decisions are made exclusively and absolutely by the owner.

Moderators dont consult the membership regarding disciplinary actions. We discuss matters with each other, in private. That is how it should be and how it will always be.

It's natural for people to want input and explanation, but it simply isnt possible. The issues surrounding disciplinary stuff are often very private and I doubt anyone wants all the dirty laundy aired in public. It would open debate up to factions, cliques, friends etc and no honest and fair resoultion would EVER be reached. It would be a destructive and damaging process, not just for the individuals concerned, but for many others as well.

Consulting the membership or even offering explanations is often simply out of the question. You have to decide whether youb can understand this and accept it or not. But you must realise it wont ever change.

There are a number of bushcraft forums now and it is noticeable that since I joined BCUK many of the experienced bushcrafters that used to frequent these pages and had a lot to offer have drifted away, thanks to the fact that they have become disillusioned with the whole affair, gently pushed or banned.
Many of them are working to thier own agendas, commercial interests and power plays Adi. In some cases, their interests have conflicted with BcUKI's neutral position and have either been asked or told to cease and desist. In some cases, they have been unable to accept BcUK's commercial neutrality and have left, in other cases, they have been banned. It's sad, but BcUK isnt going to compromise it's values to accomodate 3rd part power plays and commercial interests. It's thier choice, they can either use BcUK under BcUK's terms and conditions, or leave. What they cant do is write thier own terms and conditions.

The abject lack of any significant success of any of these "other" forums, should tell you that the agendas under which some of them have been created, is plainly clear to many people. If the content of these other forums and websites, was as good, as honest and agenda free as BcUK's then these forums would be as successfull or moreso than BcUK. As it stands, many of them rely heavily on mining BcUK for members, rather than generating thier own on thier own merits.

Tony I address this to you and I apologise that I am doing this in public but I think it only fear that you and the members paying or not have an open and honest discussion with how the forum should be run.
The members opinions are considered by Tony, but there will never be open consultation. This forum is owned outright by Tony. Members do not buy shares, they make voluntary contributions for a number of reasons, some because they are simply gratefull for the work and appreciate the costs involved and want to help out. Others contribute to gain higher level access to forum facilities. But in no case, can a member buy the right to have a say in how the forum is run. it's not promised or implied.

I, like many others are full members after paying a subscription. Many of use have voiced our concerns with how the forum is run but you have not had the decency to address any of these questions instead we continue to be palmed off by often aggressive replies from moderators and some of the moderator chose to use the PM facility to make there aggressive threats which I am sure there are many members that can verify that fact.
Tony is not obligated to address any of your concerns. Your concerns are heard, but frankly you presume too much. By what right do you think you should have a say in the management of BcUK? Were you ever promised such input? Was it ever offered or even implied?

Tony you want people to give money and subscribe to BCUK to help you in the running costs, which people are willing to do but they are soon turned off if they do not perceive the service they expect


Service? You are not buying a service, this isnt a transport cafe. Contribute financially if you want, if you think what you get here is worth contributing, then do it. But if you dont think it's good value, then dont contribute. It's your choice. Remember though, you are NOT BUYING A SERVICE! You are not buying anything.
...and most people want a forum that is friendly, helpful and informative but as soon as you have people with big sticks beating members down (and that is how some of the moderators come across) things need to change, at the end of the day the only person that losses out is you because the members will stop logging on and stop subscribing.
Then that's what will happen. The rules are there and if the members break them, they will be moderated and whining about it wont help anyone or anything.

I expect this thread to be deleted very quickly and I expect I will be banned with in a very short time. Which is a great shame as I am only publicly expressing the views of many people on the forum. It would be great to see this thread run with lots of constructive input from yourself and the members in a grown up manor. And, possibly we can make BCUK a places were people want to be again.

You have voiced your concerns and I doubt you will be banned for it, but you will be put straight. Yopu need to realise this forum is Tony's and Tony's alone. You dont buy right here, you contribute if you like what you get and many, many people do. If you are one of theose people who is unable to accept the authority of moderators, then you will alweays clash with them. But they are not going to make allowances for you sensitivity. The rules are there and they are going to continue to be enforced by moderators. You need to find a way to live with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gregorach

Adi

Nomad
Dec 29, 2004
339
5
British Red said:
Adi,

I thought this thread started very well. I thought you voiced a balanced and reasoned concern. I agreed completely with Spamels first post (I still do).

I'm only a relative newcomer to this forum so I try to stay out of the politics as I know my place.

However you last "crack" at Toddy offends me - Toddy has been welcoming, friendly and very fair since I joined the forum - even sending me material to help me at her own expense. She has never been known to "give it all" in my experience.

If you genuinely believe you have the right to insult others directly and other forums directly and then ask for them to withdraw without defending themselves I think you are the one being unfair and not to say rude.

By all means criticise an event, but please leave out the insults and behave as the gentleman I know you to be

Red

I am sorry I have offended you Red.

I just wonder how many of her posts and PMs have offended, she have offended me once which she cared to ignore and she has lost me once. which she solved with a compass apparently.

But we are not talking about one person we are talking about how the forum is run from the point of a few moderators.
 

MagiKelly

Making memories since '67
Adi Fiddler said:
Magikelly / Stuart there are lots of people on here that have over the last year have had to put up with unjust actions and aggressive pm's from moderators,

Such as?

Adi Fiddler said:
It is not my place to bring these to your attention because the people that received this treatment my feel they dont want it dragged up again. If they have experienced this treatment then it is down to them to express it here and to post the PM's they were sent here is the wish to.

But you did bring it to our attention. You started the thread. So finish what you have started tell us who you are talking about and what threads you are talking about. Stop squirming.

I do not want to seem aggressive or blunt but I believe the phrase is "put up or shut up".
 

andyn

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
Aug 15, 2005
2,392
29
Hampshire
www.naturescraft.co.uk
my only thoughts are that there seems to be a lot of impaitence going on recently.

Some of which seems to be coming from the moderators, which I have to say that I wouldnt expect to be seeing.

Stuart, and i'm only using this example as its the freshest in my ming...you must have spent a long time constructing your reply to Leon-b yet it comes across as being extremelly condersending and very rude. It must be really difficult to try and ensure topics stay on track and arent repeated all over the place but I cannot see how some of the moderation that is going on is constructive to the ethos of this forum.

I remember when I first joined this forum and was very green to bushcraft or survival and had only doen normal camping before so I asked a question about what things people tend to sleep out under as all i had knowledge about were tents and didnt think these were the most suitable things in woods...I got a response from a mod stating that they would like to scream ARRRGHHHH at me for asking that question. It made me feel about 1" tall and that id done something wrong.

A poorly worded reply can leave a bitter taste towards that person and I think that seems to be occuring a lot recently.

My only other comment would be to toddy, why are you displaying an angry and aggresive attitude to the members that your suppose to be supporting. Up until recently I have always enjoyed reading your threads and listening to what you have to say. But your content seems to be of a different nature recently and a tad stern. Just my thoughts.

Maybe this is what some otehrs are trying to say. I dunno. I can only express my feelings.
 

Stuart

Full Member
Sep 12, 2003
4,141
50
**********************
thank you Andyn for providing an example from which we can progress:

Stuart, and i'm only using this example as its the freshest in my ming...you must have spent a long time constructing your reply to Leon-b yet it comes across as being extremelly condersending and very rude. It must be really difficult to try and ensure topics stay on track and arent repeated all over the place but I cannot see how some of the moderation that is going on is constructive to the ethos of this forum.

the 'unseen background' to this as it were, was that Leon-b was the second user account that this individual opened and was being used simultaneously to ask the same questions, we closed the first account and left the Leon-b account active.

having two accounts and stealing pictures from the BCUK gallery for a website are both in breach of the BCUK rules but due to the purported age of this individual extra patience was given in an attempt to resolve the issue via Pm and e-mail

When this failed I choose to make a clear public statement in the hope that it would raise a response

As you mention I did spend a great deal of time attempting to ensure that the public statement to Leon-b was clear and concise. the problem was growing, not only in shear volume of posts by leon-b asking the same questions but also complaints received with regards to copyright theft.

I did not make any specific attempt to be polite as I felt that my post was not directly offensive and my main focus was to be direct and leave no room for misunderstanding, though Leon-b purports to be 14, I felt this was of adequate age to address him as I would an adult.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

BCUK Shop

We have a a number of knives, T-Shirts and other items for sale.

SHOP HERE